Robert Good is a Realtor with Keller Williams Advisors in Santa Monica. Specializing in working with Seller’s and Buyer’s of property within Santa Monica, Culver City, Playa del Rey, Brentwood, West LA and Greater Los Angeles.
CalDRE#01501493.
Broker CalDRE#01499010
#Realtor #PropertyProfessional
www.RobertGood.com
Wednesday, October 05, 2005
A particularly good post by Cathy.
Cathy Odgers has done it again...... I think she should write a book, or even dare I say it...run for office one day..... Now I am sure she will deny wanting to do either, but a good suggestion none the less.
Clearly Cathy is not familar with the half plus seven rule.
An older man should use as a guide his age, divided by half, and add seven years to find the minimum age that he should date without looking seedy or stupid.
So therefore, a 40 year old man could quite logically date a 27 year old, but a 23 year old would be too young.
A fifty year old man could date a 32 year old lady without raising eyebrows, but a 26 year old would be far too young.
Yes, but I am sure there is room for movement in that.... If it was the other way around I am sure some of the guys could find many valid points to change the numbers to 1 or 2.
Clearly Cathy is not familar with the half plus seven rule.
ReplyDeleteAn older man should use as a guide his age, divided by half, and add seven years to find the minimum age that he should date without looking seedy or stupid.
So therefore, a 40 year old man could quite logically date a 27 year old, but a 23 year old would be too young.
A fifty year old man could date a 32 year old lady without raising eyebrows, but a 26 year old would be far too young.
Ah the 7 year rule..... Good one Pablo.
ReplyDeleteWhich means, hypothetically and by way of example, that at age 23, one should not be with a 16 year old.
ReplyDeleteah well in most parts of the world, that is against the law anyway.
ReplyDeleteAh Cathy...... another great reply.....
ReplyDeleteYes, but I am sure there is room for movement in that.... If it was the other way around I am sure some of the guys could find many valid points to change the numbers to 1 or 2.
ReplyDelete